<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Exceptions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jamesthigpen.com/blog/2008/01/07/on-exceptions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jamesthigpen.com/blog/2008/01/07/on-exceptions/</link>
	<description>I Write Software. Rawr.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:05:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Thigpen</title>
		<link>http://www.jamesthigpen.com/blog/2008/01/07/on-exceptions/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>James Thigpen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesthigpen.com/blog/2008/01/07/on-exceptions/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>But that implies multiple exceptions being thrown, which can&#039;t(?) occur.  It&#039;d be more like DonkeyException, MonkeyException, KittyException E, but then you lose exactly which type was thrown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But that implies multiple exceptions being thrown, which can&#8217;t(?) occur.  It&#8217;d be more like DonkeyException, MonkeyException, KittyException E, but then you lose exactly which type was thrown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shey</title>
		<link>http://www.jamesthigpen.com/blog/2008/01/07/on-exceptions/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>shey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 05:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesthigpen.com/blog/2008/01/07/on-exceptions/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Looking at your idea, I find it kind of verbose, it could get gross and I have a preference for:

catch(DonkeyException d, MonkeyException m, KittyException k)
{
...
}

assuming java wouldn&#039;t complain that I didn&#039;t use variables d,m or k.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at your idea, I find it kind of verbose, it could get gross and I have a preference for:</p>
<p>catch(DonkeyException d, MonkeyException m, KittyException k)<br />
{<br />
&#8230;<br />
}</p>
<p>assuming java wouldn&#8217;t complain that I didn&#8217;t use variables d,m or k.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
