<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Simple BDD Reporting with NUnit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jamesthigpen.com/blog/2009/05/07/simple-bdd-reporting-with-nunit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jamesthigpen.com/blog/2009/05/07/simple-bdd-reporting-with-nunit/</link>
	<description>I Write Software. Rawr.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 06:18:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deran</title>
		<link>http://www.jamesthigpen.com/blog/2009/05/07/simple-bdd-reporting-with-nunit/comment-page-1/#comment-4931</link>
		<dc:creator>Deran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 21:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesthigpen.com/blog/2009/05/07/simple-bdd-reporting-with-nunit/#comment-4931</guid>
		<description>I played with NBehave for a bit and it seemed pretty cool
http://nbehave.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I played with NBehave for a bit and it seemed pretty cool<br />
<a href="http://nbehave.org/" rel="nofollow">http://nbehave.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Thigpen</title>
		<link>http://www.jamesthigpen.com/blog/2009/05/07/simple-bdd-reporting-with-nunit/comment-page-1/#comment-4888</link>
		<dc:creator>James Thigpen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 14:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesthigpen.com/blog/2009/05/07/simple-bdd-reporting-with-nunit/#comment-4888</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t used RSpec yet, it&#039;s on my gigantic list of things to check out. *need more hours!*

And as far as whether the tests are passing or not, I still use r# for my test runner, and I kind of see the passing of the tests as an orthogonal concern to what my specs are/what the report tells me, so I&#039;m not sure if it&#039;s worth the effort.

I could be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t used RSpec yet, it&#8217;s on my gigantic list of things to check out. *need more hours!*</p>
<p>And as far as whether the tests are passing or not, I still use r# for my test runner, and I kind of see the passing of the tests as an orthogonal concern to what my specs are/what the report tells me, so I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s worth the effort.</p>
<p>I could be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Scheirman</title>
		<link>http://www.jamesthigpen.com/blog/2009/05/07/simple-bdd-reporting-with-nunit/comment-page-1/#comment-4886</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Scheirman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 13:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesthigpen.com/blog/2009/05/07/simple-bdd-reporting-with-nunit/#comment-4886</guid>
		<description>You still need to tie in to see if these are actually passing or not!

Have you used RSpec?  It&#039;s beautiful how it arranges your describes/shoulds (they can be infinitely nested).

It also shows you which ones FAIL, and on an ANSI terminal window, you can even see reg/green colors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You still need to tie in to see if these are actually passing or not!</p>
<p>Have you used RSpec?  It&#8217;s beautiful how it arranges your describes/shoulds (they can be infinitely nested).</p>
<p>It also shows you which ones FAIL, and on an ANSI terminal window, you can even see reg/green colors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

