<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bing Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jamesthigpen.com/blog/2009/06/10/bing-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jamesthigpen.com/blog/2009/06/10/bing-me/</link>
	<description>I Write Software. Rawr.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 06:18:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Thigpen</title>
		<link>http://www.jamesthigpen.com/blog/2009/06/10/bing-me/comment-page-1/#comment-5984</link>
		<dc:creator>James Thigpen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesthigpen.com/blog/2009/06/10/bing-me/#comment-5984</guid>
		<description>@Tim:

For me, wolfram alpha is a really specific thing.  I really like it, but it&#039;s not a search engine, it&#039;s a &quot;knowledge engine&quot;.  If I want to know some fact like &quot;population Houston&quot;, I might turn to wolfram.  It&#039;s gonna get me the (an?) answer the quickest.  And for mathy things it&#039;s awesome.

I like the search on wolfram &quot;2 apples + 1 onion&quot;.  That really show it&#039;s got some cajones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tim:</p>
<p>For me, wolfram alpha is a really specific thing.  I really like it, but it&#8217;s not a search engine, it&#8217;s a &#8220;knowledge engine&#8221;.  If I want to know some fact like &#8220;population Houston&#8221;, I might turn to wolfram.  It&#8217;s gonna get me the (an?) answer the quickest.  And for mathy things it&#8217;s awesome.</p>
<p>I like the search on wolfram &#8220;2 apples + 1 onion&#8221;.  That really show it&#8217;s got some cajones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Erickson</title>
		<link>http://www.jamesthigpen.com/blog/2009/06/10/bing-me/comment-page-1/#comment-5983</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Erickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesthigpen.com/blog/2009/06/10/bing-me/#comment-5983</guid>
		<description>Good word, James.  With the advent of Bing, I did the same with Firefox (set default search to Bing).  A former coworker of mine would do this regularly - each month rotate to using the next of the few major search (errr.... or \decision\?) engines.  He was focused more on the design/layout of the result pages than search accuracy, but I definitely appreciated his take on keeping up with one&#039;s alternatives.  Unfortunately, I have yet to see any reason to use WolframAlpha, but I&#039;ll try it again every now &amp; again, as per your sage advice :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good word, James.  With the advent of Bing, I did the same with Firefox (set default search to Bing).  A former coworker of mine would do this regularly &#8211; each month rotate to using the next of the few major search (errr&#8230;. or \decision\?) engines.  He was focused more on the design/layout of the result pages than search accuracy, but I definitely appreciated his take on keeping up with one&#8217;s alternatives.  Unfortunately, I have yet to see any reason to use WolframAlpha, but I&#8217;ll try it again every now &amp; again, as per your sage advice :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

